GOD, NO GOD AND BROCCOLI

Trinity College recently released its 2008 American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), which revealed a steady rise in the ranks of non-religious Americans. One of the country's largest ever surveys of faith and belief, the latest ARIS found the percentage of Americans who don't claim a religious identity climbed to 15%, nearly double the number reported in 1990.

“Many people thought our 2001 finding was an anomaly," observed Ariela Keysar, who conducted the survey with Barry A. Kosmin. "We now know it wasn't. The 'Nones' [non-religious people] are the only group to have grown in every state of the Union."

According to the 2008 survey:

Only 1.6% of Americans call themselves atheist or agnostic. But based on stated beliefs, 12% are atheist (no God) or agnostic (unsure), while 12% more are deistic (believe in a higher power but not a personal God). The number of outright atheists has nearly doubled since 2001, from 900 thousand to 1.6m. Twenty-seven percent of Americans do not expect a religious funeral at their death.

The first ARIS survey was released in 1990, during the presidency of George H.W. Bush—a man who in 1987 reportedly said he didn’t believe that “atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots". 

This was a stunning statement, one that would've rendered Ronald Reagan junior, the atheist son of the sitting president, in search of a green card. But perhaps President Reagan never got the news, since Bush’s hideous quote didn’t exactly create a political storm. Evidently calling atheists non-citizens and non-patriots was a yawn compared to the stunning revelation that he disliked broccoli.

These surveys show a significant non-believing population in America, but there are some who consider atheists a relatively new species. In a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed decrying the charmlessness of 21st-century atheists, Sam Schulman opened his piece with the line, “When the very first population of atheists roamed the earth in the Victorian age . . .”  How interesting to learn that atheism is a modern invention, no older than the photograph! Also, it is not true: long before humans believed in God, they didn’t. Every primate and every infant, after all, is an atheist. "The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God", according to Psalm 14:1, written well before "Nicholas Nickleby".

Nobody panic, but it seems there is even a "fool" in Congress (yes, even there). In 2007 Pete Stark (CA-13), a longtime Democratic congressman, became the first openly “nontheist” in the history of the United States Congress. “Nontheist” appears to be a word that some atheists call themselves, not unlike liberals who call themselves “progressives”. 

Here's the official congressional tally, according to a recent Pew report. As the Trinity survey shows (and Pew confirms), atheists are under-represented. While over 16% of Americans say they are not affiliated with a religion, no one in Congress will admit to this. (While an atheist, Stark is actually a Unitarian-Universalist, so he is affiliated with a religion.)

Still, we are seeing a long overdue place for atheism in American politics and culture—both in rhetoric and representation. After all, this latest survey comes less than two months after Barack Obama became the first president to mention non-believers in an inauguration speech, despite his own faith. 

It is certainly reassuring to know that atheists in America are finally being taken as seriously as, say, broccoli. 

~ BRADLEY FREEDMAN

Picture credit: goa_entranced (via Flickr)

News  RELIGION  

Comments

I haven't finished reading


I haven't finished reading the ARIS Report, but did they really skip Alaska and Hawaii entirely in the regional Division breakdown? Aren't we part of the U.S.too?

religion in the public square



AS an evangelical christian, increasingly convinced of ther truth of the gospel, I have always found the interference of christians in politics and public affairs to be hypocrisy anbd blasphemy. They want God to be brought back into the "public square," they say. But I assert that God never was in it, only the empty rhetoric instead. Thus I totally oppose the Religious Right

Every prayer whereby any political congress or parliament opens its proceedings and then proceeds to enact the laws it sees fit to do so is a taking of God's name in vain; and even if they could be coerced into enacting "righteous" laws this would violate the very principle of what the Law of God is for as spelled out in the Bible

Thus in my view atheists etc are welcome to the political establishment: as His klingdom is not of this world christians had no place in it in the first place.

AS for the rise in atheism, well, given that JEsus said the way was narrow and few there were to find it, I am pleased at the rise of honesty whereby people for centuries have pretended to be christians when they were not but now dispemse with the obscene mockery of publically established religion

Reasons for the growth in number of atheists


I expect this article would analyze the phenomenom, and not simply cheerlead for it. It seems to me that there are a number of factors involved. One is the face given to religion by the rise of radical Islam. It suddenly became bitterly clear that people claiming to have a deep religious faith also were the most backward, primitive, hate- filled group of humanity on earth. Religious Faith in this case came with total fanaticism and disrespect for human life.
Another element is I think the radicalization of the university world, and the increasing place given to an anti- American and anti- American exceptionalism ideology.
A third and more long- lasting, and to my mind, legitimate factor comes from the endless human usurpation of powers which were formerly considered mysterious and even divine. This extension of human power, however imperfect, one only needs to think of the changes in family structure given by new reproductive technologies, gives a sense of God's now being replaceable and superflous.
From the point- of- view of one who does hold a traditional religious faith in God as Creator and Sustainer of the Universe it is this last consideration which is most problematic and challenging.

reportedly not the same as confirmed...


Do we really know that GW Bush made this statement as the writer of the piece used the phrase "reportedly": George H.W. Bush—a man who in 1987 reportedly said he didn’t believe that “atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots".

Reportedly is not the same as "confirmed" but yet that is enought for the writer to go after Mr. Bush in the next paragraph.