FIVE THINGS: THE TAO OF JOHN WATERS

john waters role modelsJohn Waters's new book "Role Models" is a collection of conversational essays about the people who have inspired his cult filmmaking. The book includes a hellish Little Richard interview, a tribute to Johnny Mathis, his  life-long idol, a section on a fabled mistress of Baltimore bars, and a boatload of perverts.

"Role Models" ia a roundabout autobiography in the best sense: a portrait of Waters through the lens of the people he loves best and the ways in which he thinks about them. It's a gleeful, wisecracking read with a heart of gold (or pyrite, perhaps), much like Waters's films and presumably the man himself. Here we've culled five nuggets of wisdom from within the pages of "Role Models", each addressing a crucial topic.

On wealth:

"Being rich is not about how much money you have or how many homes you own; it's the freedom to buy any book you want without looking at the price and wondering if you can afford it. Of course, you have to read the books, too. Nothing is more impotent than an unread library."

On reading:

"You should never read just for "enjoyment." Read to make yourself smarter! Less judgmental. More apt to understand your friends' insane behavior, or better yet, your own. Pick 'hard books.' Ones you have to concentrate on while reading. And for God's sake, don't let me ever hear you say, 'I can't read fiction. I only have time for the truth.' Fiction is the truth, fool!"

On fashion:

"Always be dressed in your full cult finest in case you are arrested. There is only one fashion photograph that counts in our world: the perp walk."

On religion:

"Jesus Christ himself? I do believe he thought he was the son of God, but anybody can make an innocent mistake. He probably was a good man. A fashion leader, certainly. A little self-absorbed. A tad deluded, just like us. But as an elegant acquaintance recently pointed out, 'My husband died of cancer and it took him about five years of terrible pain and agony to finally expire, and Christ was only on the cross for a weekend. What's the big deal?' She may have a point."

On privacy:

"The ultimate celebrity accomplishment is convincing the press and public that they know everything about your personal life without really revealing anything."

"Role Models" by John Waters is published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux in America

~ MOLLY YOUNG

Art  Books  Film  five things  Publishing  books  

Comments

The Difference: Jesus CHOSE to suffer for us


'My husband died of cancer and it took him about five years of terrible pain and agony to finally expire, and Christ was only on the cross for a weekend. What's the big deal?'

The big deal is Jesus CHOSE it. He knew the pain he would suffer, and he chose to do it anyway, so that we might live forever.

No. He didn't.


Jesus did not choose anything. He was born specifically for god's bloodlust. It was god who said that blood must be shed in order to "save" man who god set up to fail(sin) in the first place. So this loving god decided it was a good idea to kill his son in place of sinful man who wouldn't have sinned had god not decided upon it. A truly loving god would have avoided all this nonsense altogether & created a world w/o sin. A truly all-powerful would have had the power to do just that. Instead, a cruel, evil, jealous, vindictive god created a world of suffering and chooses to blame it on the "fall" of man. And that the "free will" he gives to man is what prevents him from intervening and ending this suffering. It's a crock and in fact, reduces the Christian god to a weak, impotent, helpless figure.

Do you ask yourself why you need to define your terms on others?


A loving God doesn't dispense morphine and endless, uneaned, meaningless joy - or pain. Isn't the "I'm so bright and tough" argument anti-Christians and prosletyzing atheists use that the rest of us are "avoiders" who "can't bear pain or truth"?

Twaddle. It's so typically European. Unsatisfied with your own personal beliefs, you deterministically and intolerantly choose to try to take away the beliefs and self image of others.

No wonder so many emigrate to less shallow, less intellectually bereft places. I'll bet you even think offhand bombast such as we see in Waters makes him "witty, novel , and sharp". It's the recycles, overused pedantry of hiding behind a false cynicism that one finds with adolescents fearful that they'll be discovered to have had no life experience.

What then?


What *does* the loving bible-god do then, Joe?
My description of god's character & jesus' death is spot on as these are not 'my' terms. These are the terms of your bible.
If I'm capable of 'taking away the beliefs & self-image of others' by stating what is in the bible then maybe those beliefs deserve a deeper examination by the believer. Furthermore, if your self-image lies in the image of god in the bible, then look again at his *actions*. He's not really a loving, merciful god, is h, Joe? If you say yes, then ask yourself these well-known questions:
Is God willing to prevent evil & end suffering, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able to do so, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is God both able and willing? Then why is there evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then he is not god?" —Epicurus (3d c. BCE)
"Free will" is not an acceptable answer to these questions.

The Five Things?


Is it because our world is so 'God-centric' or is it because we are still not very far from our late primate-ancestors that we seem stuck on a who-done-it version of creation? What about the Four Others? Personally I find his remarks on wealth and reading deserving a long list of comments. Any reader with a comment on the on the issues?

Thanks.

doors


27 Jun 2010 ... John 4:24, "God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and ... Read more about Tao Te Ching: Our Creator - Taoism of Lao Tzu .
thanks;custom doors