LOVE AND POLYAMORY

big love2.jpg

How many lovers are too many? Catherine Nixey ventures into the burgeoning world of polyamory to find out ...

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE

If you are having trouble finding "The One", then spare a thought for polyamorists, who must also find "The Two", "The Three" and, in some cases, "The Three and a Half". "Finding the right partner is hard," says Erich, a polyamorist (who prefers not to disclose his surname). "Finding the right partner whose partner is also right..." Erich shakes his head. "Now that's really hard."

As anyone with a passing knowledge of professional golf, royal families or Premier League football understands, the practice of taking several lovers is hardly novel. What makes polyamory unique is that everyone knows about each other and is even pleased about it. Sometimes they even become lovers themselves.

Unconventional though it may sound, polyamory—or "many loves"—is becoming more prominent. In America the poly-pride movement holds large rallies; last year Britain's first poly website was launched, and recently published poly books, such as "Open" and "The Ethical Slut", are promoting polyamory in print. Mo'Nique, an Oscar-winning American actress, freely discussed her open marriage in a televised interview with Barbara Walters recently. Polyamory is hardly common, but its adherents are seemingly multiplying.

Maxine Green, a 28-year-old artist with pink hair, explains why she is a polyamorist.  "Monogamy just never made any sense to me," she says. "I just couldn’t imagine being with one person forever." After a moment’s thought, she says she has "two and a half" partners, including Erich. The couple has been together for a year, though Maxine's other relationships have been going for four.  "It's a bit like ice cream," she explains. "I love chocolate ice cream. But I wouldn't want to eat nothing else for the rest of my life."

Yet one is not usually in a position of comforting a chocolate scoop after a night out gorging on strawberry. Hurt feelings don't seem to be part of the polyamorous lifestyle. "I don’t consider myself to be ‘unfaithful'," Maxine explains. "As long as I spend enough time with someone, then I feel I’m being faithful to that person." How much time is enough? "As much time as it takes for everyone to be happy." This can vary from several evenings a week to once every few months, depending on whether one is dealing with a "primary" or "secondary" partner.

If polyamory differs from conventional romantic relationships, it is also unlike the more familiar unconventional ones, too. This is something that polyamorists are often at pains to clarify. For example, unlike most polygamous arrangements, polyamory is not religiously motivated, and practitioners are split evenly between men and women. Indeed, Erich suggests that polyamorists are often atheists. "Polyamory is not like swinging," he insists. "This is emphatically not only about sex, it is about long term relationships."

Surely such arrangements invite feelings of jealousy, or insecurity? "Not at all," says Erich. "On the contrary, I feel more secure now, because I am not defined by being one half of a couple: I am complete as myself." Or, as Maxine puts it: "The knowledge that my partners return to me because they want to, rather than because they know they must, gives me a wonderful boost." Though both concede that "Polyamory is not for everyone. Some people can't cope with it."

Some argue that polyamorists have a particularly healthy approach to dealing with inevitable romantic pratfalls. "They haven't eliminated the problem of jealousy," observes Andrew Samuels, a professor of analytical psychology. "There are of course still difficulties within polyamorous relationships...but they are dealing with it rather than denying it. I have been extremely impressed by the amount of thought, care and attention that polyamorous couples expend on their relationships."

To this effect, Erich suggests that polyamory is fundamentally more honest than monogamy. "People have always slept with more than one person," he says. "But previously, such relationships would usually have been concealed. We are simply being open about it."

Occasionally Maxine, Erich and their other halves (and quarters, and possibly even eighths) all meet together for a dinner party. When they do, says Erich, they all get along ‘fabulously’. Though, in practice, such events rarely happen. Less, explains Maxine, because of social difficulties than temporal ones. "Time management is tricky," she says. "Being polyamorous means you have a lot of people to juggle."

So convinced is Erich of the virtues of polyamory that he feels it will, one day, become the norm. "Fifty years ago pre-marital chastity was unquestioned," he says. "Now it seems little more than a peculiarity. One day monogamous relationships may be seen in a similar light." However, just as the threat of pregnancy once provided an obvious incentive to avoid pre-marital sex, surely child-rearing offers an analogous reason for a more conventional single-partner commitment?

Not for Erich. "The polyamorous community is perfect for raising children," he says. "Instead of the nuclear ‘ideal’ in which one person must stay at home, looking after the children—and going crazy—the poly marriage is more like that pre-industrial ideal, in which each child has several adults caring for it, and each parent has a great deal of support. Poly children are some of the most sorted and socialised I know."

LOVE AND POLYAMORYThe notion of polyamory is still widely greeted with scepticism. Joan Roughgarden, a biologist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, also serious reservations about the lifestyle. "The likelihood of being able to successfully raise children in that context is very limited," she says, “My guess is that it's not an evolutionary advance, but a liability."

Samuels would disagree. "What children really need for mental well-being is love, consistency and boundaries. The sexual behaviour of the parents has absolutely no impact on a child's mental health," he says. "Indeed, if anything, the polyamorous relationships I have seen provide a more favourable environment for children because the polyamorous parents, aware of their unusual situation, think so carefully about every aspect of what they do." He is convinced this lifestyle is spreading. "Polyamory is the fastest growing style of relationship," he says.

Precise numbers on polyamorous relationships are difficult to find. Thus far polyamorists have proved rather shy about giving data on their habits. However studies quoted recently in Newsweek put the number of polyamorous families in America at over half a million.

Each September Erich and Maxine organise an annual polyamory forum. The last was the biggest yet, with 300 attendees, up from 100 a few years ago. It featured seminars, discussion groups and "fun and games workshops." This is not a euphemism, Erich clarifies. "Fun and games means charades,” he says, firmly. “Orgies do happen," he admits. "But they really are not the point of what we do. The point of polyamory is to enable people to have loving relationships with more than one person.

"But why, I ask, for a final time, must a loving relationship include sex?

Erich looks at me. "But why," he rejoins "Must it not?"

(Catherine Nixey writes for the Times, the Spectator and the Tablet. Her last piece for Intelligent Life was on paternity tests)

Picture Credit: aussiegal, jude hill (both via Flickr)

Lifestyle  Issues and ideas  lifestyle  

Comments

In response to this article


It is true that Polyamory is not for everybody. You have to work past the initial frustrations of jealousy, insecurities and fear of loss. Of course I'm speaking from the standpoint of opening up an existing Monogamous relationship. The shift in mindset can be taxing and quite brutal. But in the end love and trust seems to trump all frustration. Especially if you really want to experience and sustain a lifestyle filled with the many joys in which Polyamory can offer. It's a beautiful thing.

Polyamory


New Direction:Hindu religion's Gods & Goddesses seemed to have followed polyamory and polygamy too. What was it about polyamory that it had to be kept undercover till the present? Human Peoples have traditions of identifying themselves with customary ambience of living & nonliving things, surname, caste, born-in-illage, parents' names, etc. upto a certain average period of time - during childhood & adoloscence and even young adulthood. Later, it is upto the rationale amidst the beliefs & superstitions & impulsiveness etc. of the human mind as to how well and quickly it adapts to & mingles with the different social identities it has to pass and mingle through. If a child begins to be told about its own parents living faroff, or , of its own nonliving possessions which are not in the child's immediate reach and ambience, it may generate a difficult and nonpositive food for its thought. Thus, humans, who have to live 100 years of life could well live with their own parents until maturity,rather than with a polyamorous parent who opts for another game partner after the conceiving and before the delivery of a child.

Monogamy


It's strange how monogamy took such a stronghold on our moral beliefs though it is only a couple of centuries old. I think that the ice cream metaphor as well as several other quotes in the article, are not specific to polyamory and could just as well be said for serial dating, while there is really a significant difference between the two. A terrific discussion on Monogamy and polyamory I'd recommend:
http://www.pandalous.com/topic/monogamy_2

*Sigh*


Well it's a positive toned article, just a shame that so many of the quotes are incorrect or made up. Erich most certainly never said anything about "Finding the right partner whose partner is also right..." as that's nothing to do with how we do poly, and just perpetuating a popular misconception, and I certainly didn't say I couldn't imagine being with someone for the rest of my life - I certainly can, I just don't see why that means I can't love more than one person at the same time.

I can see why you did it, Catherine, in an attempt to make it easier for folks to understand, but it's just not accurate!

There is a better description of how we actually organise our relationships on my blog, http://emanix.livejournal.com and here http://xeromag.com/fvpoly.html

I have a lot of sympathy for writers wanting to discuss these topics that hold a great fascination to the general public and starting out without a deep level of understanding, but this just adds to my inclination to stop talking to journalists and write my own articles instead.

Let's Be Clear


I enjoyed this article very much and appreciate Catherine Nixey's taking on the subject. As a long-time polyamory community leader, educator and advocate I want to share a couple of thoughts.
About jealousy - all human beings get jealous, it's a primal evolutionary behavior that was intended and did support pair bonding when two people sticking together at least long enough to bear children and raise them up enough to survive under harsh conditions was literally necessary for survival of the human species. Today we are stuck with it though it is a bankrupt relationship strategy, despite that it serves no useful purpose, and its presence in us is exacerbated by societal reinforcement that says that acting out in jealousy is justifiable behavior if we think someone else has an interest in our partner.
Regardless of its origins and contrary to common assumptions, we polyamorists don't see jealousy as a dealbreaker and instead learn how to manage if not resolve it. I've been teaching workshops on just how to do this for ten years.
About monogamy - it is a fine choice, and that's the position polyamory advocates generally take on the subject. Most of us are very skeptical about the idea that one day polyamory will be the norm more than monogamy. Human beings are strongly inclined to pair bond, and for some that's all that is needed or desired. On the other hand, we polyamorists prefer to pair bond in multiples. Whether choosing monogamy or polyamory, what is important is making an intentional, carefully evaluated choice as to what form of relationship will best suit our own needs. Polyamory is no better than monogamy, just another valid option to carefully consider. I'd hate for anyone to come away from this article thinking otherwise.

I'm very pleased to see a


I'm very pleased to see a positive tone in this article. It's a shame that so many of the quotes were incorrect, but that does seem to be the way of things in journalism nowadays. Fortunately, many articles are posted on sites like this that offer comments, so that the interview subjects can come here and clear things up.

As Maxine said, many, if not most, polyamorists *can* see themselves with individuals for life. It's just that we don't necessarily see ourselves with ONLY a single individual for life. In fact, monogamous people don't do that either. There is both a decline in life-long romantic partnerships in general and a fairly steady trend throughout history (and continuing today) of developing friendships that are just as strong as the romantic bond, which last for life. In fact, polyamory is all ABOUT developing long-term relationships.

Polyamorous relationships span the entire spectrum of relationships that monogamous ones do. The only difference is that poly relationships are allowed to overlap, whereas monogamous ones are not allowed to overlap (although they sometimes do).

Western culture favors serial monogamy, so all anyone has to do is look over their dating history and see the different types of relationships they've had over their lifetime. Some were very deep bonds, some were not as much, and every partner clicked in a unique way that no other partner quite did. Some were believed to be the "love of one's life" at the beginning, even though some of *those* ended before the lives ended. But, through it all, the monogamous tendency is to form long-term bonds, even if some relationships do not end up being long-term. Polyamory is the same way. We just don't have to lose one relationship to try out another.

~Joreth
(since it won't recognize the .html suffix as valid, I'm posting my homepage as part of my sig:
http://www.theinnbetween.net/poly1.html

Re '*Sigh*'


Maxine, you might believe that 'Erich most certainly never said anything about 'Finding the right partner...'' But I would disagree. As, indeed, would the recording I made of the interview.