OF MYTHS AND MUSEUMS

akam_museum.jpg

In honour of Charles Darwin's birthday, Natasha Lennard reports from a creationist museum in rural America ...

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE Ken Ham worries about Britain. He believes the country is an example of the fate that faces nations that walk a secular path. “Something terrible is happening there. It’s a spiritual wasteland,” he booms from a video recording to a rapt audience. He then enumerates such horrors as English churches that have become shops and fitness centres. Ham is the president of Answers in Genesis, a creationist organisation based in Kentucky. The group uses the Bible to explain all scientific phenomenon. For example, the question “are dinosaurs a mystery?” has a simple answer: “dinosaurs are only a mystery if you accept the evolutionary story of their history.” Genesis explains that these creatures first existed around 6,000 years ago, when God made them along with the other land animals on day six of the Creation Week (Genesis 1:20–25, 31). AiG's website goes on to explain that Adam and Eve were also made that day, “so dinosaurs lived at the same time as people, not separated by eons of time.” While Britons last year proudly marked the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth (February 12th 1809) and the 150th anniversary of the publication of “The Origin of Species”, Answers in Genesis’s flagship enterprise is a $35m museum dedicated to the biblical story of creation, based in the rural heartland of Boone County, Kentucky. The Creation Museum, a modernist, glassy, 70,000-square-foot bastion of anti-science, eschews a Darwinian world-view. Instead it presents a natural history of the earth as the Bible would have it, complete with dioramas of Adam and Eve frolicking in the Garden of Eden (no monkeys, these). As A.A. Gill wrote in Vanity Fair, the museum “answers the famous question about what God could have done if he had had money”. Since opening in May 2007, the museum has welcomed over 1m visitors onto its lakeside premises, according to its vice president and co-founder, Mark Looy. The museum faced down some local opposition to be situated among the rolling fields of Petersburg, Kentucky, a day’s drive from two thirds of the country and only seven miles from the Cincinnati airport. It also happens to be just a few miles along the interstate from Big Bone Lick State Park, the so-called “birthplace of American vertebrate palaeontology”, where Lewis and Clark trolled for mastodon bones on their transcontinental expedition in 1807. While archaeologists at Big Bone, along with the vast majority of the contemporary scientific community, believe in evolution and an old earth, the 12 full-time staff scientists at the Creation Museum have a “very different starting point,” according to Jim Lisle, the museum’s scientific advisor. This starting point is the Bible, in particular a seven-day period about 6,000 years ago, when God is said to have created the world. All of the usual evidence scientists use to theorise on the age of the earth (4.54 billion years, give or take) and the origins of species, such as fossils, skeletons and genetic mutation, can be explained by the Old Testament: the great flood laid the fossils down. When I visited the museum in November, I was surprised to see security guards flanking the entrance. Dressed like state troopers, they wielded loaded guns and restrained formidable-looking Alsatian dogs. “There has been graffiti and protests outside,” explained Looy when I asked him about these protective measures. “But on the whole there’s no disruption.” Of the 4,000 visitors the museum receives on an average day, most are devoted Christians. The extra security lends an air of righteous danger to the exhibits inside, a sense of being besieged. Inside the building’s 40-foot-high glass walls visitors are treated to a whistle-stop tour of Biblical history, arranged in a way that would not seem out of place in Disneyland. A darkened tunnel leads to a vast and verdant Garden of Eden, filled with exotic plastic flowers, peaceful creatures and pools of gentle water. A comely Adam discovers a comely Eve, whose modesty is preserved by her long, dark, synthetic mane. The garden also includes a wealth of prehistoric animals, such as a Tyrannosaurus rex, which we are told was tame and herbivorous before Adam and Eve snacked on that dastardly apple. Dinosaurs had to have coexisted with humans, we learn, because there were no carnivores before man’s fall, and fossils show that some dinosaurs preyed on others. Therefore, the Creation Museum concludes, dinosaurs must have existed after the fall. But aren’t dinosaur-related fossils millions of years old? AiG and the museum have a handy explanation: such fossils only seem old because “organic materials are relentlessly attacked by bacteria,” so they decompose quickly. “Without the millions–of–years bias,” explains Andrew A. Snelling, the director of research at AiG in a paper published in Creation magazine, “these fossils would readily be recognized as victims of a comparatively recent event, for example, the global devastation of Noah’s Flood only about 4,500 years ago.” The museum’s approach to creation “probably would not convince non-believers,” Lisle admits, despite its slogan: “Prepare to believe.” In contrast to the bucolic prelapsarian delights of Eden, modern fallen life is represented in a narrow corridor, decked out like an alley in Amsterdam’s red-light district. Sirens blare, neon signs buzz, and torn newspaper clippings about war, famine and murder are pasted to the brickwork like out-of-date posters, next to articles about gay marriage and abortion. The museum’s message is unequivocal: misery comes from a life lived according to the vagaries of ungodly reason. Other exhibits include a mock-up cabin from Noah’s Ark accompanied by numerous scaled-down models of the vessel. “I’m very interested in the ark,” said one visitor in a deep southern timbre, “it must have been quite an undertakin’.” While I wandered around the museum, I couldn’t help noticing that these fundamentalist advocates of intelligent design—the notion that the complexity of life can only be explained by an intelligent creator—displayed a keen awareness of intelligent museum design. Visitors emerge from a tour of Biblical history into a vast gift shop stocked with T-shirts, toy dinosaurs and an extensive array of creationist literature, much of which was penned by Ken Ham himself. Suddenly, those strenuous efforts to reconcile scripture and the dinosaurs seem commercially justified: kids do adore ancient reptiles, particularly when they get to own a model of their very own. During my visit most everyone I met had come in order to have a world-view confirmed, not challenged. They seemed to fall in one of several categories: large families; church groups (in matching sweatshirts); and Mennonites, or Christian sectarians, whose female adherents dress in ankle-length, pale-blue pinafores and bonnets. “I believe in the Bible, no ifs ands or buts,” chirped Pam Riley, a financial adviser with blonde bouffant hair. She organised a trip with her church group from nearby Louisville. “I can see how someone who grew up being taught that evolution is true would find it strange here,” said Tim Klippenstein, a 17-year-old Mennonite. “But we were brought up to believe the Bible.” Like many of the men in his sect, he left at 14 and now works on his family’s farm. I felt a little guilty in the company of such enthusiasm. I had gone with the tacit aim of treating the trip like a safari, to observe the loony creationists in their natural habitat. Yet I was also struck by the impeccable manners and kindness of everyone I spoke to. At a demonstration called “Snakes Alive!”, which takes place three times daily, I watched Rick Teepen, a local herpetologist, introduce his large collection of reptiles to an audience of 20 children, many of whom seemed to struggle with the lesson. He was engaging and kind, and I found myself so impressed with his patience that his constant refrain “Isn’t God amazing?” ceased to seem jarring after a while. However, when I took my seat in the packed 210-seat auditorium to view the daily showing of Ken Ham’s video, “State of the Nation”, my concerns about religious dogmatism flared anew. Ham condemned homosexual behaviour and gay marriage as shameful, provoking piercing cries of "Amen" from the audience. He spoke with horror about America’s insistence on “tolerance” and warned that the country could become like Britain, a nation in which six out of ten children believe religion has a negative influence in the world. All the southern charm in Kentucky could not render Ham’s message palatable. Unsettled, I returned to my rental car, a hulking landship I had hired in an attempt to fit in. As I drove away from the Creation Museum, its lake and glass walls glistened a warm pink in the pure evening light. Later, on the interstate to the nearby Cincinnati airport, an upbeat country song came on the radio with a refrain that seemed appropriate: “God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy,” the singer crooned. (Natasha Lennard is a writer based in New York) Picture credit: Simon Akam

 

Places  Museums  Places  religion  

Comments

Fools. There's just no other


Fools. There's just no other word for it. Or polite word, anyway. I really don't care what adults choose to mislead themselves with (there's nothing you can do about that), but subject impressionable children to that??? It's intellectual child abuse, plain and simple. What's the difference between Joe Camel and a Creationist Dinosaur?

Straw man fallacy etc


I disapprove of Answers in Genesis' attempts to play politics as well, and have ceased to support their site for this and other reasons.

But to deride creationism as anti science is simple straw man fallacy and bigotry.

Of course the evolutionist has his own religious mythology as to origins, namely "in the beginning was nothing and it exploded". Then, somehow, molecules became alive then defied every law of genetics and conservation of energy there is to evolve from microbes to man.

I no longer have that kind of unreasoning "faith" - faith in the worst sense of the word, blind superstition against all evidence.

Some creationsists, like myself, resist the religious right; and I regard tolerance as utterly crucial for without freedom of thought there is no honesty of thought. But then tolerance is no guarantee of quality of thought, as evolutionists' "just so" stories attest.

This attempt to ridicule creation science by linking it to the ignorance of certain religious types as well as to the religious right does the author no credit.

the scholarship is not honest, or it is lazy, and the bigotry of one religion (atheism is a religion as it gives man a sense of "primary concern" - the standard relgious studies definition of religiom) against another is palpable.

For shame!

As someone who lives in


As someone who lives in Cincinnati, it is always hard to see that our biggest attraction is a pilgrimage of ignorance for some and an anthropological study for others. AiG is a blight to the region which perpetuates stereotypes of backwardness which is far outside of the norm. Though many people here do attend church, most people take more of a Joel Olsteen positivity only approach to religion which does not really address these questions.

I feel as though I am being a bit to defensive but when you live in a place which is best known for race riots and fundamentalist museums, one has a bit of a tendency to take this attitude.

One final note, the museum was paid for in full by private donations and is completely debt free, with most of the donations coming in at under a hundred dollars. Just a bit disconcerting.

Speaking of strawmen, how


Speaking of strawmen, how about the hoary claim that atheism/secularism/science is a religion, universities are churches, and professors/scientists our priests? Aside from being cute, this belief or claim doesn't stand up to the slightest scrutiny.

All you do find when you look at creationism/intelligent design are charlatans whose blind zealotry to Biblical literalism allows them to perpetrate and sell bad science. Right now, we need more scientists to fix problems, not more Genesis-loving quacks screwing up the Texas School Board and the textbooks that eventually find their way to school desks.

As a parting shot, I'd like to mention how ironic it is that these same fundamentalist Christians have no problem using science for Every Other Aspect of their lives from cell phones to cars to guns to TVs to computers to flying in planes to weather reports (you name it), but somehow, when science has the temerity to prove where we came from, it somehow is dishonest or falls short. Apparently physical evidence is insufficient to counter the ignorant words of a tribal text written thousands of years ago. Stupid us.

p.s. It without saying that the earlier gentleman on this thread is completely misinformed about the Big Bang and the generation of life (his description suggests he frequent one too many quack sites), but that's another discussion. Suffice it to say, atheists/secularists/scientists/whomever don't take spiritual solace in the Big Bang, it's just what the overwhelming evidence tells us, and the same goes for evolution. If you think that biologists and anthropologists and anthropologists are covering up flaws in evolution, then you don't seem understand how science works. Any scientist would kill to make a discovery that would overturn evolution and suggest a more correct method at describing how life evolves and speciates.

For further enlightenment, I encourage to give this a read. I know you'll find it interesting reading--facts and truth usually are:

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-qa.html

The Real Question


It may surprise many in the U.K. that most Americans are weary of the Evolution vs. Creationism argument. In fact, even to us who accept the theory of evolution, jokes about fundamentalists may be funny, but we are tired of them. We’ve had nearly one hundred years of scornful witticism and that is quite enough.

What most seem not to realize is that the whole misbegotten evolution “fight” is in actuality a proxy war for two very different outlooks on life. The real dispute is: a.) Are we simply products of necessity and chance? Or b.) Are we created beings of a forgiving and loving God?

Strictly speaking, evolution does not answer the philosophical/theological question. Nonetheless, many “evolutionists” hold to the non sequester that the science proves that God does not exist. Likewise, the science should not provoke the anxieties of the fundamentalists that if one part of the Bible is proved false then none of the Scriptures are true.

Perhaps both sides should become a little more sophisticated. At least sophisticated enough to stay out of each others business. Perhaps to be sophisticated enough to realize that the God of the universe is under no obligation to make sense of Himself to us.

Get your facts straight!


am stunned by the incredible amount of lies within this article. Did you research ANYTHING about the museum before posting your incredibly biased "findings"? To name just a few discrepancies:

The museum is worth $27 million, not $35 million.

The museum has had approximately 950,000 visitors--not over 1 million.

The museum wouldn't fit 4,000 people inside. On a daily basis, the musueum gets several hundred visitors with summer days topping 2,000. Anywhere close to 4,000 and they start to turn people away.

State of the Nation is not shown on a daily basis. Where did you get THAT from?

You visited on a slow weekday and saw a small percentage of the visitors to the museum, yet you draw the conclusion that anyone and everyone who comes to the museum must fits into three categories that you defined. You have no statistical research to uphold your conclusion and are committing a pretty severe logical fallacy with your claims.

There's much more, but at this point this is all I'd like to bring to your attention. Perhaps you should actually put some research into your writings next time, and maybe take a course in sound logic before trying to belittle those who actually reason through their beliefs.

Calling Your Bluff


Evolutionists are bluffing when they say their beliefs are scientific. Be sure to look at the list of evolutionists who refuse the debate challenge from Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo. See the list at http://www.lifescienceprize.org/.

One-sided views


I have to say, I find this article (and publication in general) incredibly biased. I typed up a long comment showing all of the discrepancies between this article and the truth of what happens in the museum (for instance, there's no one named Jim Lisle on the staff, nor does the museum show State of the Nation daily, nor have 4,000 visitors on a daily basis) and it was marked as spam. Funny how something showing evidence against this article filled with misinformation can't get published, and only the comments in agreement are shown.

In response to 'Get your facts right'


Thank you for you comment.

In response to the questions you raise: my information about visitor numbers was gleaned from Mark Looy of Answers in Genesis. As the spokesman for the museum, I felt he was a reliable source for facts and figures.

The original building may have cost $27m to construct, but with further exhibits added the current cost of the museum is $35, according to Looy.

When I visited in November, the State of the Nation was indeed showing daily.

And Jim Lile, at least at the time of reporting in November, was a staff scientist at the museum - I have his contact details to hand.

Kind Regards

Natasha Lennard

Who is the more foolish, the


Who is the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him, Obi Wan Kenobi. the point is that either believe in creation or BELIEVE in evolution. both are theories, un proven!! Although one, creation can be tested with obsevational science, while the other is based on un testable speculations. and as far as subjecting children to a parents belief what about the evolution based ideas backing men like Hitler who subjected children to believe in one race being better than another and killing over 6 million jews, or is that just nature's way of selecting the better species?

Discrepancies


"And Jim Lile, at least at the time of reporting in November, was a staff scientist at the museum - I have his contact details to hand."

Last I checked, the person you're writing about was named Jason Lisle.

Not all are fools


Many are just ignorant. But I reckon that many people who mock creationists and believe in evolution would have difficulty in explaining why the theory of evolution is valid. For that matter, most people would be hard pressed to explain the difference in evolution as a fact vice the theory.

Evolution is a fact; it is a


Evolution is a fact; it is a fact because of the massive amounts of verifiable data (or proof).

The theory of evolution regards exactly how evolution works. There are a lot of holes in how it all works and scientists are constantly refining the theory as more evidence comes to light.

By the bye, how is creationism testable?

Irony


I had assumed that more intelligent readers would read the more intelligent life, but the commentors on this article suggests otherwise.

Red Herring


What I struggle to see understand is why fundementalists constantly bring up the issue of creationism.

The bible is not has never been anever will be a scientific text book.

That does not make any less authoritive as a book of salvation history, talking about the nature of God the nature of man and the relationship between the two. own terms

Fundementalism falls into the trap of refuting the assumptions of science on its own terms whihc is that somethign can only be true if it can be physically proven,naturally measured or rationally constructed.

Thought this stance sounds appealking to the modern mind it is actually a very reductionist view of the world that very few people actually live by.

Creationists Have the Spirit of Antichrist


Creationists are the greatest enemies of God and Christ, proving themselves to be ignorant fools and making people think they have to choose between belief in God and Christ and believe in evolution. Just because there are people who believe in a "literal" (mis)interpretation of the Bible, that doesn't mean that their interpretation is even remotely correct. Anyone who needs to believe in utter nonsense in order to believe in God doesn't believe in God. Creationists and intelligent design theorists (who believe in an incompetent God) are the tools of Satan.

Many are just ignorant. But


Many are just ignorant. But I reckon that many people who mock creationists and believe in evolution would have difficulty in explaining why the theory of evolution is valid. For that matter, most people would be hard pressed to explain the difference in evolution as a fact vice the theory.