THE BRITISH COUNCIL FILM FESTIVAL IN ISRAEL
PINING FOR THE MANDATE | February 2nd 2008
Ahron de Leeuw/Flickr
Adam LeBor travels to Israel for a festival of films from the Mandate era. After witnessing grainy footage of barking British officers and squabbling Palestinians and Jews, he is surprised to learn of nostalgia for the days of empire ...
Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE
Capturing a city in the Middle East was so much easier a century ago. Back in 1917, General Allenby, commander of British forces in Palestine, simply walked into Jerusalem through the Jaffa Gate. His brisk entrance and respectful reception by the city's notables was recorded for posterity on silent black-and-white film. In today's information age of sound bites, high-speed downloads and instant internet access, such footage seems merely a quaint relic of a bygone era. But its very silence, in a Zen-like way, demands the viewer's full attention. And that brings its own rewards, I discovered on a recent trip to Israel.
To mark the 60th anniversary this May of the founding of the Jewish state, the British Council organised a cinema road show of films from the Mandate period. The reel of General Allenby was followed by some evocative footage of Australian troops riding their horses into Jaffa just minutes after the city's capture. There is no shooting or dodging between buildings. The Aussies ride through Clock Tower square as smiling and relaxed as if they were going to a barbecue. The square looked little different then: the magnificent Clock Tower in the centre flanked by two rows of low shops. Each viewing of the films reveals new details: the delight on the faces of the Arab boys in Jaffa as they spot the cameraman; a forgotten Ottoman flag in a doorway in Jerusalem as General Allenby walks past; the sinewy, fluid motions of the Jaffa fisherman unloading cargo from their tiny boats as the waves buffet them up and down.
The archive films were curated by the London artist Judy Price, and the films were followed by a panel discussion after each showing, with myself, James Barker from the Imperial War Museum and a rolling cast of Israeli television journalists and academics. All of the films were engrossing, both visually and for what they told us of contemporaneous attitudes. The women and children repairing the road to Jericho in one short did not look very pleased: British officers in crisp uniforms strode about, barking instructions and waving their swagger sticks at the poor fellaheen (peasants) as they sorted through piles of stones. In fact the Palestinians barely featured at all in any of the films, other than as exotic and backward farmers, tilling the soil with wooden ploughs that, the plummy narrators' tones told us, had barely changed since the days when the ancient Israelites had worked this same land. Edward Said would have had a field day.
But as the organisers pointed out, the festival's aim was to show Palestine as it was seen then by Britain, and not through today's multi-cultural perspectives. The relationship between Britain and Palestine was always tangled. The Balfour declaration of 1917 promised Palestine as a "National Home" for the Jews, which the Zionists interpreted as meaning a Jewish state. The indigenous Arabs thought differently and demanded an independent Palestine. By the second half of the 1940s a three-way war was raging, with Britain stuck in the middle and increasingly anxious to be rid of Palestine. The film "Palestine: this Modern Age" was a remarkable documentary that carefully showed both sides of the conflict, using modern cinematic techniques that anticipated today's current-affairs programmes. By the end, the narrator is virtually demanding that the United Nations take charge of the problem.
Much British blood was shed in Palestine as the Jewish Irgun and the Stern Group unleashed waves of bombings and shootings on the army, police and Mandate officials. Yet still a kind of Anglo-nostalgia lingers among many older Jewish Israelis. The Mandate helped shape Israel as it is today, right down to the red post boxes that can still be seen on Israeli streets, and the number 144 that Israelis still dial for directory enquires, long out of use in Britain. Allenby has several streets named for him, and a bridge across the Jordan. There is even a theory, suggested by one man in the audience (with his tongue only slightly in his cheek), that the Mandate administration was the ultimate Jewish mother. Britain encouraged and nurtured the nascent institutions of the Israeli state-to-be, wielding a firm hand when necessary but allowing them space to grow.
Certainly in Jerusalem especially, many viewers seemed positively nostalgic for the days of empire: a recruitment film for the Palestine police, which made battling terrorists and insurgents seem terrific fun, triggered a spontaneous burst of applause afterwards. One Jerusalemite waxed lyrical about his childhood memories of Scottish troops on parade, and the sound of the bagpipes.
Still, Britain eventually tired of her squabbling charges and departed in a huff in May 1948. The special relationship lives on in the person of Tony Blair, the former prime minister, now Middle East envoy for the quartet--of the US, the UN, Russia and the EU. Unlike General Allenby, he cannot go for a walk about in the Old City of Jerusalem without serious protection. Empires rise and empires fall, but the attempts to bring peace to Israel and Palestine are set to continue for a long while yet.
(Adam LeBor is a journalist and author of "City of Oranges: An Intimate History of Arabs and Jews in Jaffa".)


Delicious
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Comments
British Mandate, Promises Made and Broken
February 3, 2008 - 23:24 — Hasan A Hammami (not verified)I haven't seen the film that Adam refers to, though I would like to see it. To think why Palestinians were smiling as they watch the British forces come into Jerusalem and Jaffa, is to understand the feeling they had after being ruled by the Ottoman Turks for 400 years, fighting on the side of the WWI allies against the Axis Powers then and being promised their Independence following the war. Instead, Britain "crafted" for itself a League of Nations document called "Mandate First Class Over Palestine", in which it promised to assist Palestinians to found their state within ten years. Instead, Britain stayed for thirty years, and without batting an eye suppressed several Palestinian revolts with cold-blooded British military effectiveness. Everyone knows about the conflicting promise made by Lord Balfour to establish a national home for the Jews in Palestine, without ... affecting the rights of its original people.
So Britain oversaw the flooding of Palestine with European Jews who had suffered the Holocaust following 2000 years of European anti-semitism, repaying its debts to European Jewry with the lives, homes and nation of the Palestinians, who had nothing to do with either the Holocaust or 2000 years of European Anti-semitism.
Just as one of the audience in Israel described Britain as the "perfect Jewish mother", bringing up the State of Israel, I describe Britain's role as the "bad mother", who "aborted the State of Palestine". Equally, the rest of Europe and America refused to take in any more than a token number of Jewish refugees from Germany and central Europe, but were effective in their hypocrisy and in foisting them on Palestine, which they did not own.
Be that as it may, why do we have to see history repeated:
-The Warsaw Ghetto replayed as the Wall that created the West Bank Ghetto.
-2000 years of European anti-semitism turn into a new start of European Israeli policy of anti-semitism against the Palestinian people.
-Dispossession of European Jews of Germany, Poland, Austria, Hungary, etc. turned into the dispossession of Palestinians.
-Creation of millions of European Jewish refugees after WWII turned into the creation of millions of Palestinian Refugees since WWII.
Should we not be looking to end dispossessing anyone, making refugees of anyone, victimizing anyone, denying statehood to anyone, denying compensation to anyone. Should we not, at the beginning of this dangerous 21st century, aim for equality, security, statehood, civil rights, religious rights and economic freedom for everyone among these two hapless peoples. Equally, with no distinction, no excuses, no accusations and no denials. Instead reach out to each other, help each other and live together. Teach our children to understand, forgive, reconcile, make peace, share and recreate a state for both people equally, with complete separation of Church, Temple and Mosque from the State.
additional
August 21, 2008 - 11:50 — Iain (not verified)There were also only 600,000 refugees that made it the Palestine Mandate despite the blocking of immigration by the British and not millions. There not millions of Jews left. The PLO's 'Palestinian Basic Law' calls for an Islamic state under Sharia Law with no recognition of anyone elses history in the area no of their rights. Israel has already agreed and withdrawn from this terroritory once but that was seen as an excuse for one last push by Arafat and Muslim extremists.
The comparison to the Warsawa Ghetto is not only totally inaccurate but highly offensive since the Jews were concentrated there for deportation and extermination in death camps built for purpose. This has never been the case in the Israel-Arab conflict of either side. Despite 'push the Jews into the sea' being the catchphrase of the PLO, Muslim extremists and the Western 'solidarity' organisations.
Post new comment