<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://moreintelligentlife.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>politics language culture profanity</title>
 <link>http://moreintelligentlife.com/taxonomy/term/275</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>When adverbs aren&#039;t adverbs, and swearing isn&#039;t language</title>
 <link>http://moreintelligentlife.com/node/277</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot;&gt;WHY do we say &amp;quot;fuck you&amp;quot;, and not &amp;quot;fuck&lt;br /&gt;
yourself&amp;quot;?  What exactly makes certain excretions more linguistically&lt;br /&gt;
taboo (shit) than others (snot)?  Is &amp;quot;fucking&amp;quot; really an adverb&lt;br /&gt;
in the phrase &amp;quot;fucking brilliant&amp;quot;?  Steven Pinker, a linguist&lt;br /&gt;
and cognitive scientist and one of the most masterful popularisers of science&lt;br /&gt;
writing today, answers all in a long &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20071008&amp;amp;s=pinker100807&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
on profanity in the &lt;i&gt;New Republic&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://moreintelligentlife.com/node/277&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;-2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://moreintelligentlife.com/node/277#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://moreintelligentlife.com/moreover">Moreover</category>
 <category domain="http://moreintelligentlife.com/taxonomy/term/275">politics language culture profanity</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Lane Greene</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">277 at http://moreintelligentlife.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

